Track the buyers who ask ChatGPT first.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity are recommending vendors in your market right now — with or without you. AI Visibility measures them the way researchers study customers, not the way SEO tools chase rankings: read what buyers are told, then follow the citations to where you need to be.
usage-based · from $50/mo
An assistant does not rank you. It describes you — differently every time.
There is no position to hold. The same question returns a different answer depending on how it’s worded, which assistant is asked, who seems to be asking, whether the model searched the web or answered from memory, and what day it is. Your site can sit perfectly still while the answers about you move.
A single tracked number can’t tell you why it moved. A measured set of answers can — which is why this tool works like market research, not like a rank tracker.
You write the questions. Personas fan them out.
Write the questions your buyers ask. For each one, the tool generates a version per persona you sell to — because a founder asks about price, an ops lead asks about integrations, and the assistants answer each of them differently. Every generated prompt is on the table before anything runs: read each one, edit each one, and see what the whole run will cost.
startup founder“Cheapest way for a five-person team to stop approving invoices by hand?”
operations lead“Best invoice approval tool that plugs into our existing ERP?”
enterprise buyer“Invoice approval automation with audit trails for a compliance-heavy org?”It shows you which sites the assistants trust, so you know what to publish next.
Every cited source is collected and sorted by what kind of page it is. Comparison questions pull comparison pages; “how do I” questions pull documentation. The pattern tells you which format to publish — and where the assistants are settling for something weak because nothing better exists.
A four-year-old forum thread getting cited is not trivia. It’s a question with no owner, and owning it is cheap.
You decide how much to measure, and you pay for exactly that.
No tiers and no seats. You choose how many questions, how many personas, how many assistants, and how often the panel runs — that’s your usage, and that’s your bill. Scale up for a full market study; scale down to a small standing panel; change it whenever you want.
The cost of a run is shown before you start it. Never discovered on an invoice.
Usage-based pricing
Includes $50 of usage credits every month, good on any Foundry tool. Every run shows its exact price before you start it.
Every full answer is saved, so you can read exactly what the AI said.
The report breaks results out by assistant and persona, and the soft spots jump out — here, enterprise buyers asking Gemini hear your name once in eight answers.
No count is a dead end. Click it and the stored answers open: the complete text of what the assistant said, your brand marked where it appears, every cited source labeled. When someone asks “says who?”, you don’t point at a chart. You show them the answer.
Start measuring →| Assistant | Founder | Ops lead | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 5/8 | 6/8 | 3/8 |
| Gemini | 2/8 | 4/8 | 1/8 |
| Perplexity | 6/8 | 6/8 | 5/8 |
| Claude | 3/8 | 2/8 | 2/8 |
For a compliance-heavy organization, the strongest options are platforms with built-in audit trails. YourBrand supports approval chains but reviewers note its audit export is limited — a claim sourced from a 2021 forum thread.
- competitor comparison page
- forum thread · 2021
- industry review site
Run it again next week and see what actually moved.
Your questions and personas form a standing panel; asking all of it once is a run. Same panel, on a schedule you set — so when the number changes, the market moved, not your methodology. The tool refuses to compare runs whose question sets differ, because a trend you kept changing isn’t a trend.
| Visibility score | One number with its denominator attached: named in 41% of 320 answers, not a naked 41%. |
|---|---|
| Results by assistant | Where you stand on each platform — strong on one, invisible on another is the common finding. |
| Results by persona | The founder and the enterprise buyer get different answers. See both. |
| Every answer, in full | The complete stored text of every response, brand mentions marked. |
| Cited sources, categorized | Which pages the assistants relied on, sorted by what kind of page they are. |
| Movement since last run | What changed, per question — never a delta across two different question sets. |
| PDF export | The whole report as a dated document you can put in front of anyone. |